Biggs and Frankenweenie

From Collider.com

Last week, the students of The World of Tim Burton seminar kicked back to Frankenweenie. The animation is a remake of the director’s first short film created in 1984. That same year, Disney decided not to collaborate with animator Tim Burton because they considered his live action short to be too dark and too frightening for children. I disagree with this statement because at the core of the movie, one can see that is simply a tale of a boy and his dog. A lonely and misunderstood child loses the one thing that is important to him, his canine friend. The dog was a faithful companion to the child, and he was also the comical star of the boy’s home movies. But now that the dog is gone is sufficiently tear-jerking. The young scientist’s stitching and attaching together of parts of his dog after it has been dead proves to be heartfelt and touching rather than dark and scary. Burton went back to the drawing board, and he decided to reprise the short using a new medium, stop-motion; he also expanded the short in to a full-length film, adding in an hour of silly drama and incident. It was not until 2012 that the franchise united with the gothic director to produce his stop-motion-animated, black-and-white, 3D film Frankenweenie.
 


In the movie, the director channels the classic tale of Mary Shelley’s Frankestein by putting an elementary spin on it with Victor Frankenstein. Victor is a young, alienated student who is an avid lover of film-making and the subject of science. His partner in crime is his hyperactive canine friend Sparky. Early in the movie, Sparky is hit by a car and killed after he went chasing after a baseball into traffic. Inspired by his wicked yet passionate science teacher, Victor becomes a mad scientist, and he works diligently to bring his friend back to life. The stitched-up Sparky rises from the grave, and this miracle then inspires Victor’s classmates to do the same with figures of their past. This chaos turns the little suburban town into the perfect setting of an old-time horror movie.

From IGN.com
The difference between the 1984 version and 2012 version is that the early work features live action while the latter is in stop-motion animation. The advantage of using live actors is the audience can sense the level of realism, and the actions are more convincing; however, this proves to be a disadvantage for animation in that it causes a slight disconnection from the audience to the characters because the audience reminds itself that the movie is just an animation. The disadvantage with live action is that the viewers form certain images in their minds about what the characters will look like and how they will act. But once they see the movie, they are often dissatisfied that the characters do not take after the thoughts formed in their heads; an automatic disconnection is present there. An advantage with stop-motion animation is that there are no limits to the action. The characters will not interfere with the preconceived notations formed with live action movies.

To conclude, Frankenweenie was a great remake of the live action short from 1984. The touching tale depicted relationship drama about the love between a boy and his dog. It is a brilliant creation in that the emotional range is wide. It is very gloomy in some parts, but the humor overshadows the darkness; the sympathy does so as well. Victor’s longing for Sparky is heartfelt. After witnessing that, he does not seem like a strange and crazy scientist; he is just boy who misses his best friend.

Posted in , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. RSS feed for this post.

Leave a Reply

Powered by Blogger.

Search

Swedish Greys - a WordPress theme from Nordic Themepark. Converted by LiteThemes.com.